The next step for ICAM

Every incident,
understood.

For decades the depth of an investigation has come down to who happened to be available. InvestigatePro closes that gap: a structured, evidence-led ICAM investigation, guided step by step, with an AI coach that holds the practice of a career full of investigations — and puts it in front of whoever is running this one.

Start a pilot See the coach at work

Set up the same day. No procurement cycle.

I supervise a crew

Run an investigation that stands up, without a week of paperwork.

I run HSE for the site

One method across every case, every shift, every contractor.

I sign the findings

Findings you can put in front of a board or a regulator.

What changes

From guesswork to evidence.

The method has never been the problem. What changes is that every finding is now held to something, and the guidance no longer depends on who is in the room.

MOVING AWAY FROM

  • Conclusions formed before the evidence is in.
  • Depth that depends on which specialist is free that week.
  • Organisational factors quietly skipped when time runs short.
  • A method that lives in a manual, not in the work.

MOVING TO

  • Every factor tied to the evidence that supports it.
  • The same guided method for every investigator, every case.
  • All four ICAM levels prompted — nothing left empty by accident.
  • The method running alongside you as the case is built.

The line this sits in

A proven method. A new pace.

1990

Reason’s model of organisational accidents — failures line up through the layers before anyone gets hurt.

1990s

ICAM formalises it for heavy industry: people, task, environment, organisation — and absent or failed defences.

Now

Decades of investigation practice, at the fingertips of whoever is running this one.

The coach carries what a seasoned ICAM lead would ask — the evidence that should exist by now, the question that opens a witness up, the organisational factor that has already appeared twice on this line. It reads the case in front of it and prompts the next step, on every investigation, not only the ones a specialist can attend.

The coach at work · Case 2026-0418

The expertise sits in the case, not in the room.

Isolation failure during a conveyor gearbox change-out, night shift. Four things the coach did with it — and what the investigator did back.

  1. Evidence gap

    Two of five lock points have no verification record, and the isolation certificate is not attached. Ask for the permit and the padlock register before the scene is released.

  2. Witness prompt

    Ask the fitter: at what point did you believe the drive was dead, and what told you so?

  3. Unexamined ICAM level

    Organisational factors are still empty. Two earlier isolation events on this line cite the same handover step.

  4. AI-suggested factorOrganisational

    Isolation verification relied on one person’s check, with no independent confirmation required on night shift.

    Accept Edit Reject Nothing is filed until you accept it.

Run the next investigation with the method built in.

Three fields, and your workspace is ready the same day. Or see it on a real case first — book a 15-minute demo.

Start a pilotThree fields. Set up the same day.