Start a 14-day trial

Every incident, understood.

A structured, evidence-led ICAM investigation, guided step by step, with a coach inside every case.

Start a 14-day trial Book a 15-minute demo
Sample report INC-2026-0001
INVESTIGATEPRO
Events INC-2026-0418 ICAM Analysis
Isolation failure during a conveyor gearbox change-out

INC-2026-0418 Night shift, transfer tower 2

High potential ICAM In progress
ICAM Analysis
Identify contributing factors across Individual, Task, Organisational, and Defence categories
AI Suggest Add Factor
Individual
1 factor(s)
Work began after the drive was stopped locally, before isolation was tested at the lock points.Evidence: E-05 fitter statement
Task/Environment
1 factor(s)
Night shift with a reduced crew; the five lock points sit on two levels of the transfer tower.Evidence: E-04 scene photographs
Organisation
1 factor(s)
Isolation verification relied on one person’s check, with no independent confirmation required on night shift.Accepted by the lead investigator
Defences
2 factor(s)
No test-for-dead step at the gearbox drive before work started.Evidence: E-02 lock-point records
Isolation certificate not attached; two of five lock points without a verification record.Evidence: E-01, E-02
Sample case, simplified from the product’s ICAM Analysis screen.

Who InvestigatePro is for

I supervise a crew

Run an investigation that stands up, without a week of paperwork.

See the coach at work

I run HSE for the site

One method across every case, every shift, every contractor.

How the method runs

I sign the findings

Findings you can put in front of a board or a regulator.

Read a sample report

The expertise sits in the case, not in the room.

Isolation failure during a conveyor gearbox change-out, night shift. Four things the coach did with it, and what the investigator did back.

  1. INC-2026-0418 Evidence register
    Evidence register
    Collected by PEEPO category
    Add evidence
    RefItemCategoryStatus
    E-01Isolation certificate (permit to work)ProceduresMissing
    E-02Lock-point verification records, L1 to L5Equipment3 of 5
    E-03Padlock register, night shiftProceduresRequested
    E-04Scene photographs, gearbox driveEnvironmentAttached
    E-05Fitter statementPeopleScheduled
    E-06SCADA event log, 21:00 to 23:30EquipmentAttached

    Evidence gap

    The coach compares what should exist by now with what the case holds, and names what is missing.

    Evidence
    Coach: Evidence gap

    Two of five lock points have no verification record, and the isolation certificate is not attached. Ask for the permit and the padlock register before the scene is released.

    Investigator requested the permit and the padlock register
  2. INC-2026-0418 Witnesses
    Witness interviews
    Planned for the next 24 hours
    Add witness
    Fitter Interview 06:40, before handover
    Walk me through the change-out from the moment the drive stopped.
    At what point did you believe the drive was dead, and what told you so?
    Night-shift supervisor Interview 07:15
    How was the isolation handed over at the start of the job?
    Control-room operator Interview 07:40
    What did the conveyor show on your screen at 21:10?

    Witness prompt

    It drafts the question that opens a witness up, for the interview that is about to run.

    Witnesses
    Coach: Witness prompt

    Ask the fitter: at what point did you believe the drive was dead, and what told you so?

    Added to the fitter’s interview plan
  3. INC-2026-0418 ICAM Analysis
    ICAM Analysis
    Coverage across the four levels
    AI Suggest
    Individual
    1 factor(s)
    Work began after a local stop, before isolation was tested.
    Task/Environment
    1 factor(s)
    Night shift, reduced crew, lock points on two levels.
    Organisation
    0 factor(s)
    No organisational factors yet
    Defences
    2 factor(s)
    No test-for-dead step at the drive.
    Certificate missing; 2 of 5 lock points unverified.
    INC-2025-1107 · handover step INC-2026-0122 · handover step

    Unexamined ICAM level

    It flags a level left empty and points to earlier events on the same line.

    ICAM levels
    Coach: Unexamined ICAM level

    Organisational factors are still empty. Two earlier isolation events on this line cite the same handover step.

    Investigator opened both linked events
  4. INC-2026-0418 ICAM Analysis Suggested factors
    AI-Suggested ICAM Factors
    Analysis complete: 1 factor, 0 gaps
    OrganisationCites E-02, E-05, INC-2025-1107
    Isolation verification relied on one person’s check, with no independent confirmation required on night shift.
    Reasoning: the lock-point records carry one signature each, and both earlier events cite the same handover step.
    Accept Edit Reject
    The report lists this factor under the lead investigator’s name, with its sources.

    Suggested factor

    It drafts a factor with its reasoning and sources. The investigator accepts, edits or rejects it.

    You decide
    Coach: Suggested factor, organisational

    Isolation verification relied on one person’s check, with no independent confirmation required on night shift.

    Accepted by the lead investigator

From guesswork to evidence.

The method has never been the problem. What changes is that every finding is held to something, and the guidance no longer depends on who is in the room.

  1. Conclusions formed before the evidence is in.

    Every factor tied to the evidence that supports it.

  2. Depth that depends on which specialist is free that week.

    The same guided method for every investigator, every case.

  3. Organisational factors quietly skipped when time runs short.

    All four ICAM levels prompted, so nothing is left empty by accident.

  4. A method that lives in a manual, not in the work.

    The method running alongside you as the case is built.

From first notification to a report you can sign.

One method carried through the whole case. Sample data from INC-2026-0418.

See the platform
Evidence, by PEEPO

People, environment, equipment, procedures and organisation. Every item gets a reference the findings can cite.

All four ICAM levels

Read from the organisation down to the event. Each level is prompted on every case, so an empty one is a finding, not an oversight.

Sequence of events

Times and sources on one line, so the gaps in the story show before the analysis starts.

Actions on the hierarchy of controls

Each corrective action sits on the hierarchy, so a retraining-only fix is visible for what it is.

Verified, not just closed

An action reaches verified when someone checks the control works. Owner and due date stay on the record.

A report you can sign

One click renders the full investigation report, attributed to the lead investigator, as PDF or PPTX.

The report is the case, formatted.

A report generated in the demo workspace: INC-2026-0001, a conveyor guard left off after a belt change. Fifteen pages, each cause traced to the evidence behind it.

Report cover: Injury, INC-2026-0001, with document control table
Cover and document control
ICAM factor analysis page showing absent or failed defences, individual actions and task conditions
ICAM factor analysis, all four levels reported
Causal analysis page with a diagram linking causes across ICAM levels
Causal analysis, each cause linked to its basis
Corrective actions page listing actions with control type, owner and due date
Corrective actions with control type, owner and date
Read the sample report PDF, 15 pages. Demo Mining Corp is a fictional workspace.

A proven method. A new pace.

Reason’s model of organisational accidents: failures line up through the layers before anyone gets hurt.

ICAM formalises it for heavy industry: individual and team actions, task and environmental conditions, organisational factors, and absent or failed defences.

Decades of investigation practice, at the fingertips of whoever is running this one.

The coach carries what a seasoned ICAM lead would ask: the evidence that should exist by now, the question that opens a witness up, the organisational factor that has already appeared twice on this line. It prompts the next step on every investigation, not only the ones a specialist can attend.

Every investigation starts on someone’s clock.

The method holds on every case. The deadline depends on where the case happened, and the first one can be fifteen minutes.

  1. United States, minesNotify MSHA of an accident, by phone, within 15 minutes of knowing about it.30 CFR 50.10
    15 min
  2. United States, OSHAReport a work-related fatality.29 CFR 1904.39
    8 hours
  3. United States, OSHAReport an in-patient hospitalisation, an amputation or the loss of an eye.29 CFR 1904.39
    24 hours
  4. Canada, British ColumbiaComplete the preliminary investigation and its report.Workers Compensation Act s.71
    48 hours
  5. United States, OSHARecord the incident on Form 301.29 CFR 1904.29
    7 days
  6. South AfricaReport the accident to the Compensation Fund on form W.Cl.2.COIDA
    7 days
  7. South Africa, minesBegin the investigation of a reportable accident.MHSA s11(5)
    10 days
  8. United States, minesFile the accident, injury and illness report on form 7000-1.30 CFR 50.20
    10 working days
  9. United KingdomReport an over-seven-day injury to a worker.RIDDOR 2013
    15 days
  10. Canada, British ColumbiaComplete the full investigation and its report.Workers Compensation Act s.72
    30 days

Duties as written in each regulation, checked September 2026. Your site’s obligations depend on the event and the jurisdiction.

Built by someone who has run the investigations.

Devon Turner led safety across Africa and the Middle East for one of the world’s largest gold producers, with an ICAM specialism. InvestigatePro is the way he wanted every investigation run: evidence first, all four levels examined, and nobody blamed for a gap in the system.

Experience
15+ years leading mining safety
Regions
Africa and the Middle East
Method
ICAM specialist
Book a 15-minute demo Demos are run by Devon.

Free tools for real investigations.

Templates, worksheets and working tools from frontline ICAM practice. No account needed.

All free tools
The ICAM checklist in the browser: the first response steps, three ticked, and a progress meter reading 3 of 25

The 25-point ICAM checklist

From the first thirty minutes to close-out. Tick items off as you go; your progress stays in your browser.

Open the checklist
PEEPO chart builderBuild a contribution chart in the browser and export it. ICAM toolkitTemplates, prompts and guides for the full method. ICAM investigation templateThe four-level structure, ready for your next case. State of Incident Investigation 2026An industry report on investigation practice and tooling.

Run the next investigation with the method built in.

Start a self-serve 14-day trial on Starter or Professional, and run your next case with the coach.

Start a 14-day trial Book a 15-minute demo
  1. Which lock points were verified, by whom, and where is that recorded?
  2. At what point did the worker believe the equipment was dead, and what told them so?
  3. Has the same isolation step appeared in earlier events on this line?

Example questions for this kind of incident. On a live case the coach reads your evidence, statements and timeline, and cites them.

Running several sites?

Business and Enterprise start with a guided pilot on your own cases. Leave three details and Devon calls within one working day.